On sale now at amazon.com

Controversial Russian bankers target Crimea


by OCCRP

Editor's Note: This investigation was done by the Washington, D.C.-based Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, a Kyiv Post partner.

This story and others in the Russian Laundromat series can be read on OCCRP's website here.
Some of the first banks that streamed into Crimea after Russia wrested control of the region from Ukraine in 2014 were better known for laundering money than banking.
Five of the banks have questionable histories, including ties to the $20 billion money laundering scandal known as the Russian Laundromat revealed last year by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project. Although most of these banks were small and barely known in Russia, they have grown significantly since arriving in Crimea.
Their presence raises questions about Russia’s commitment to eliminate money laundering, amid concerns that Crimea could become another major international money laundering and organized crime zone like Transnistria, Ossetia and other disputed territories on the Russian border.
Financial meltdown
It’s been more than a year since Crimean voters chose to leave Ukraine and join Russia in a disputed referendum. That quick decision led to a wholesale meltdown of the region’s banking industry.
Ukrainian banks operating in Crimea rushed to close almost 1,000 branches in Crimea, following a ban imposed by the National Bank of Ukraine on financial operations in the contested territory. As they left, they may have taken with them the assets and deposits of some local account holders although how much is not clear. They also left with loans they gave out often unpaid.
At the time, Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk-based Privatbank was the largest network with 337 branches followed by the Ukrainian state-owned Oshchadbank, with more than 250 branches. Ukraine’s banking regulator refused to cooperate with the Russian occupation authority as relations deteriorated.
Trade with neighboring Ukraine screeched to a halt. Then waves of international sanctions hit the region. Mastercard and Visa suspended operations making life even harder for consumers as suddenly their credit cards became useless plastic.
The Black Sea Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the Morskoy Bank, two local Crimean banks, stayed behind but they couldn’t handle the overwhelming customer demand. People were forced to stand in queues for days to pay fees, taxes and duties of vital importance to their businesses; some fainted from the strain.
The new rulers of the Crimean Federal District attempted to establish a new financial system even as they were hit with a sharp drop in the ruble and a severe shortage of ruble reserves. They quickly passed a law to create a new financial infrastructure and a brand-new financial institution, the Fund for Depositor Protection. The FDP’s role was to handle compensation payouts to Ukrainian banks’ depositors and to administer the 'nationalized' property of the Ukrainian banks.
Closely following Kremlin troops into this chaos came a few small Russian banks with controversial pasts and good connections. They were the first to benefit from the nationalization of property. They would be followed by more respected banks later – there are now 28 different Russian banks on the peninsula – but the first benefited the most.
From a U.S. prison to Crimean shores
On April 4, 2014, Genbank became the first Russian bank to open its doors in Sevastopol just two weeks after the peninsula became part of the Russian Federation. At the time, Genbank was unknown to most Russians, having branches only in Omsk and Rostov-on-Don.
The small bank was ranked 315th place among Russian banks in terms of total assets managed. But, since the annexation of Crimea, Genbank has shown tremendous growth. According to its website , the bank operates more than 90 offices in Crimea and is the second largest banking network on the peninsula.
The FDP leased to Genbank real estate and other property previously owned by Ukrainian banks, including ATMs, terminals and infrastructure. Genbank moved into the offices of Ukrainian banks that had pulled out including JCB Pivdennyi, JSC Kredobank and JSB Brokbusinessbank.
Genbank offers its clients Russian Unistream and CONTACT wire transfer services and issues credit cards, with the restriction that they cannot be used for internet payments. The bank is connected to the international payment system via Rosbank, a Moscow-based subsidiary of Societe Generale.
Genbank is partially owned by the controversial Russian banker, Evgeny Dvoskin, who controls 4.8 per cent of the share capital; his wife heads the bank’s board. Dvoskin has been investigated several times by various branches of Russian law enforcement for alleged involvement in money laundering, but has yet to face charges.
Instead, those who have investigated Dvoskin have found themselves in trouble and even sentenced to jail.
Tackling money laundering
In 2006 a group of operatives from the Russian Ministry of Interior started an investigation into a group of Russian banks involved in large-scale money laundering operations. Their effort, they say, was among the largest financial investigation ever started in Russia. Officers of the group, most of them retired today, told OCCRP that the turnover of the money-laundering operations they tracked during the three-year investigation exceeded 1 trillion rubles.
The enforcement effort was led by Dmitry Tselyakov, then a major in the Department to Combat Organized Crime and Terrorism. Tselyakov told OCCRP reporters that his group was able to identify a number of organized crime gangs that controlled dozens of small Russian banks. These banks, according to Tselyakov, didn’t conduct any real banking activities, but instead received huge amounts of illegal money in their accounts and then wired the money offshore or turned it into cash.
According to Tselyakov, Evgeny Dvoskin was one of the main characters in their investigation.
“Dvoskin, together with his ex-partner Ivan Myazin, controlled a number of Russian banks through (front men). Later, the Central Bank of Russia revoked the licenses of these banks for laundering criminal proceeds. During just several years these banks laundered and sent to offshore companies dozens of billions of dollars,” Tselyakov said.
Dvoskin’s checkered past is documented in a criminal case file which was put together by Tselyakov’s group with the help of the American FBI.
According to the file, Dvoskin was born 1966 in Odessa and, in 1977, moved to the United States with his parents. At the time he used the surname, Slusker. But in 2001, he was deported from the US after a long history of criminal charges for using forged documentation and, after coming back to Ukraine, took his mother’s surname Dvoskin.
According to the FBI files obtained by OCCRP reporters, while in the US Dvoskin was involved in a number of criminal activities. He was arrested for the first time in December 1989 for robbery and for possession of illegal drugs. The following year, Dvoskin was again arrested for theft.
Over the next 10 years Dvoskin was arrested and sentenced to jail numerous times. At various times he was accused of charges typical of a member of an organized crime gang including illegal possession of a firearm, robbery, bribery of public officials, possession of stolen property and stock fraud.
In a letter to the Russian Ministry of Interior, the FBI claimed that Dvoskin shared a cell in a US prison with Vyacheslav Ivankov, also known as “Yaponchik”, a Russian vor v zakon or “thief-in-law” who was one of the best-known leaders in the ranks of the Russian organized crime. Ivankov was shot by a sniper in 2009 in Moscow and died several months later in the hospital.
The FBI warned Russian police that Dvoskin was likely a close associate of Ivankov.
After coming back to Russia and changing his surname, Dvoskin entered the banking business. In an interrogation with the Russian police, Dvoskin explained his role in the banking sector as “providing safety and stability of financial flows for my clients. These flows go to different banks that I recommend as a financial advisor. I have a broker’s license, got an … education in America, and have great experience in this sphere. I am well known in the banking system. Thus my clients are different banks and companies. The list is very long.”
According to documents from the case file, Dvoskin and his ex-partner Myazin cooperated with scores of Russian banks. Many of those banks were later charged by Russian authorities with money-laundering.
For example, Dvoskin and Myazin worked with Migros bank, Siberian Bank of Development and Falcon bank. All three banks lost their licenses in 2006 and 2007 for violation of anti-money laundering regulations. The amount of money laundered just in these banks totaled about $3 billion.
Tselyakov claims that once his team started to investigate Dvoskin’s banks, they faced unprecedented pressure. “We wiretapped Dvoskin and his partners and found that his group had influential friends in the Russian secret services. They tried to fire me many times. One day the file cabinet of our investigator who led the case against Dvoskin was searched by officers of the Ministry of Interior and Russian FSB security service. They seized all the important documents from the criminal case,” claimed Tselyakov.
In 2008, Tselyakov, together with his partner, were arrested by law enforcement for attempting to defraud another banker of €1 million euros from another banker. That banker was another controversial Russian businessman, German Gorbuntsov, known in the media as “the black banker”. Dvoskin and Gorbuntsov knew each other Gorbuntsov would later testify. Tselyakov said the charges were false and designed to get rid of him.
Gorbuntsov and his partners have faced multiple charges of money laundering and fraud and a business partner of Gorbuntsov’s was arrested for murdering the country’s top banking regulator. Gorbuntsov is currently charged with money laundering in the Republic of Moldova and is wanted by Russian oligarchs who allege he stole hundreds of millions of dollars from them. Tselyakov was found guilty of fraud and spent more than four years in jail. The criminal case against Dvoskin was stopped and the banker got legal protection from the FSB as a witness.
Meanwhile, the Russian business daily Kommersant is reporting that Dvoskin’s bank in Crimea will merge with the state owned Crimean bank, ChBRR, although the report could not be confirmed and no details are available.
Users of the 'Laundromat'
Genbank was not the only bank to open. Some have connections to a very large money laundering scandal.
In 2014, OCCRP identified what is believed to be the biggest money-laundering operation in Eastern Europe, called the “Russian Laundromat.”
Between 2011 and 2014, organized criminals and corrupt politicians moved $20 billion in dirty funds from Russia to Moldova and then to the European Union.
The complex scheme included dozens of Russian banks including some controlled by Russian President Vladimir Putin’s cousin, Igor Putin. The money transfers were supported by fake contracts between phantom offshore companies run by proxies who hid the real owners.
The bogus transfers were then legitimized in court decisions by Moldovan judges, many of whom are now under investigation for bribery. Moldovan authorities have launched a criminal investigation into the “Laundromat” scheme but so far Russian law enforcement has not cooperated with Moldovan authorities.
Meanwhile, some of the Russian bankers involved in the “Laundromat” operations are now doing business in Crimea. According to documents seen by OCCRP reporters, Baltica, a bank from St. Petersburg, was one of the most active users of the “Laundromat.” Moldovan authorities claimed that bogus companies with accounts in Baltica moved more than US$ 2 billion to Moldova from 2011 till 2014.
The director of Baltica, Oksana Chernyak, denied any wrongdoing in a letter to OCCRP.
Businessman Oleg Vlasov is Baltica’s largest shareholder, owning 20 percent of the bank. Vlasov was also mentioned in a number of documents generated by Tselyakov’s anti-money laundering group. “According to wiretaps, Vlasov was connected to the biggest money launderers in Russia. We even interrogated him, but didn’t manage to bring any charges against him. The whole investigation was stopped and I was arrested,” says Tselyakov.
Vlasov, together with some partners from Baltica, controls the Verhnevolzhskiy bank. Verhnevolzhskiy was established in 1990 but before coming to Crimea it mainly operated in the Yaroslavskiy region of Russia, where it had a number of subsidiaries in small regional towns.
Verhnevolzhskiy entered Crimea in 2014 and now operates 26 offices. In December 2014, the Central Bank of Russia fined Verhnevolzhskiy for violating anti-money laundering regulations. The Central Bank didn’t disclose any details of the violation.
Another Russian bank which was involved in the "Laundromat" is Tempbank. Today it also operates two offices in Crimea. Tempbank was established in 1989 and in 2014 was included in a US sanctions list made in response to events in Syria and not Crimea.
According to a U.S. Department of the Treasury press release, the American government took these actions to put pressure on the Syrian regime and its supporters.
“The Treasury Department designated Moscow-based Tempbank and Mikhail Gagloev, a senior executive of the bank, for providing material support and services to the Government of Syria, including the Central Bank of Syria and SYTROL, Syria’s state oil marketing firm,” said the U.S. Department of Treasury in its statement.
More money laundering connections
K2 is a small bank from the Northern Caucasus republic of Karachay-Cherkessia and is ranked the 471th largest bank in Russia based on assets under its management. The bank was established in 1994 in Vladikavkaz, Northern Ossetia.
Since then, the bank has changed its name and headquarters a few times. After the annexation of Crimea, K2 opened six offices in Sevastopol, Simferopol, Feodosia and Evpatoria. The bank doesn't operate any of the basic tools used by commercial banks nowadays such as ATMs or pay terminals -- kiosks operated by banks to allow customers to pay their bills easily.
The share capital of the bank is divided between 14 people, with each of them controlling a stake of up to 10 percent. These shareholders are not well known in banking circles in Russia, but OCCRP found that some of them were connected with other financial organizations shut down by authorities for money laundering.
One of the main shareholders of K2 with 10 percent is Margarita Chukanova. According to the Russian commercial register, in 2006 Chukanova was a minority shareholder in the nonbanking credit organization, RK-Center. The operating license of RK-Center was revoked by the Central Bank of Russia in 2006 for money-laundering violations. The Central Bank claimed that clients of the RK-Center made fake payments in excess of 25 billion rubles or about US$ 1 billion at the time to foreign companies.
Another small Moscow-based bank which has opened in Crimea is Adelantbank. The bank was established in 1992 as Lesopromishlenniy bank and in 2012 changed its name to the current one. Adelantbank ranks 561th among Russian banks based on assets under its management. . Adelantbank operates three offices in Crimea, one in Evpatoria and two in Simferopol. The bank has no ATMs or pay terminals and one of its branches in Simferopol is located in the office previously occupied by the Kyiv-based Finance and Credit bank.
The share capital of the bank is divided between 11 persons, all of them controlling small stakes.
One of owners of Adelantbank is Maxim Lipskiy. According to the Russian Central Bank, in 2014, Lipskiy through a UK company, Brys Worldwide Ltd, held a significant stake (9.8 per cent) in another Moscow bank, Sovinkom. In 2014, the Central Bank revoked the license of Sovinkom for violation of various banking laws including anti-money-laundering. The regulator claimed that in 2013 clients of Sovinkom made dubious financial transactions worth more than 6.8 billion rubles (about US$ 207 million).
Another owner is Anna Lyga who, in 2013, through a set of Russian companies, was an owner of 6,6 % of Genbank, the bank with the second largest network in Crimea.




Bosnia and Herzegovina: Organized Crime Arrests at Country's Leading Pharma Firm


WRITTEN BY IGOR

Bosnian authorities have arrested seven people suspected of involvement in organized crime offences while working for, or doing business with, the country's largest pharmaceutical company, Bosnalijek.
 Investigators are still working to confirm the total cost of the criminal activities to official budgets, but prosecutors say it amounts to many millions of Bosnian marks over the course of a decade.
After an extensive investigation lasting many months, during which investigators say they documented irregularities in Bosnalijek's business dealings, authorities launched a police operation codenamed "Buyer".
The first five arrests took place on Wednesday, when state police raided nine locations in Sarajevo and reportedly detained Sefik Handzic, Amar Arslanagic, Aida Selvic, Izet Arslanagic and Jasmin Sepo.
Two more suspects, named in local press as Hasan Sepo and Telibecirevic Samir, were arrested the next day.
An arrest warrant for Edin Arslanagic, who is currently abroad, was also issued. According to Slobodna Bosna, Arslanagic contacted his lawyers and said he will arrive in Bosnia on Sunday. 
Police are still seeking Bojan Kebo, for whom they also have an arrest warrant.
The suspects are accused of organizing a criminal group that commited tax fraud, abuse of power, forgery of official documents, and signed contracts that damage Bosnalijek between 2002 and 2012.
Edin Arslanagic and his son Amar are both former directors of Bosnalijek, and Šefik Handžićis the former director of Bosnalijek's finance department. The other suspects hold positions at Bosnalijek, as well as the Sarajevo-based companies Brstanica and Carpe Diem.
Federal TV reported on one of the alleged offences, involving fraudulent practices in the cooperation between Bosnalijek and Brstanica. According to the report, employees of Bosnalijek were not paid a stipend for meals, but instead went to eat at a restaurant where Brstanica, owned by Hasan Sepo, provided them with meals.
Finance police reportedly found that Brstanica billed Bosnalijek for 346,428 more meals than was necessary, thereby creaming off an illegal profit of more than US$ 1.9 million.
All suspects were ordered to pre-trial detention lasting 30 days.






Controversial Russian Bankers Target Crimea


WRITTEN BY EVGENY ZHURAVLEV

Evgeny DvoskinSome of the first banks that streamed into Crimea after Russia wrested control of the region from Ukraine in 2014 were better known for laundering money than banking.
Five of the banks have questionable histories, including ties to the US$ 20 billion money laundering scandal known as the Russian Laundromat revealed last year by OCCRP.  Although most of these banks were small and barely known in Russia, they have grown significantly since arriving in Crimea.
Their presence raises questions about Russia’s commitment to eliminate money laundering, amid concerns that Crimea could become another major international money laundering and organized crime zone like Transnistria, Ossetia and other disputed territories on the Russian border.
 The Financial Meltdown
It’s been over a year since Crimean voters chose to leave Ukraine and join Russia in a disputed referendum. That quick decision led to a wholesale meltdown of the region’s banking industry.
Ukrainian banks operating in Crimea rushed to close almost 1000 branches in Crimea, following a ban imposed by the National Bank of Ukraine on financial operations in the contested territory. As they left, they may have taken with them the assets and deposits of some local account holders although how much is not clear. They also left with loans they gave out often unpaid.
At the time, Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk-based Privatbank was the largest network with 337 branches followed by the Ukrainian state-owned Oshchadbank, with more than 250 branches. Ukraine’s banking regulatorrefused to cooperate with the Russian occupation authority as relations deteriorated.
Trade with neighboring Ukraine screeched to a halt.  Then waves of international sanctions hit the region. Mastercard and Visa suspended operations making life even harder for consumers as suddenly their credit cards became useless plastic.
The Black Sea Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the Morskoy Bank, two local Crimean banks, stayed behind but they couldn’t handle the overwhelming customer demand. People were forced to stand in queues for days to pay fees, taxes and duties of vital importance to their businesses; some fainted from the strain.
The new rulers of the Crimean Federal District attempted to establish a new financial system even as they were hit with a sharp drop in the ruble and a severe shortage of ruble reserves. They quickly passed a law to create a new financial infrastructure and a brand-new financial institution, the Fund for Depositor Protection(FDP).
The FDP’s role was to handle compensation payouts to Ukrainian banks’ depositors and to administer the 'nationalized' property of the Ukrainian banks.
Closely following Kremlin troops into this chaos came a few small Russian banks with controversial pasts and good connections.  They were the first to benefit from the nationalization of property. They would be followed by more respected banks later – there are now 28 different Russian banks on the peninsula – but the first benefited the most.
 From a US prison cell to Crimean shores
 On April 4, 2014, Genbank became the first Russian bank to open its doors in Sevastopol  just two weeks after the peninsula became part of the Russian Federation. At the time, Genbank was unknown to most Russians, having branches only in Omsk and Rostov-on-Don.
The small bank was ranked 315th place among Russian banks in terms of total assets managed.  But, since the annexation of Crimea, Genbank has shown tremendous growth. According to its website , the bank operates more than 90 offices in Crimea and is the second largest banking network on the peninsula.
The FDP leased to Genbank real estate and other property previously owned by Ukrainian banks,  including ATMs, terminals and infrastructure. Genbank moved into the offices of Ukrainian banks that had pulled out including JCB Pivdennyi, JSC Kredobank and JSB Brokbusinessbank.
Genbank offers its clients Russian Unistream and CONTACT wire transfer services and issues credit cards, with the restriction that they cannot be used for internet payments. The bank is connected to the international payment system via Rosbank, a Moscow-based subsidiary of Societe Generale.
Genbank is partially owned by the controversial Russian banker, Evgeny Dvoskin, who controls 4.8 per cent of the share capital; his wife heads the bank’s board. Dvoskin has been investigated several times by various branches of Russian law enforcement for alleged involvement in money laundering, but has yet to face charges.
Instead, those who have investigated Dvoskin have found themselves in trouble and even sentenced to jail.
  Tackling Money Laundering
In 2006 a group of operatives from the Russian Ministry of Interior started an investigation into a group of Russian banks involved in large-scale money laundering operations. Their effort, they say, was among the largest financial investigation ever started in Russia. Officers of the group, most of them retired today, told OCCRP that the turnover of the money-laundering operations they tracked during the three-year investigation exceeded 1 trillion rubles.
The enforcement effort was led by Dmitry Tselyakov, then a major in the Department to Combat Organized Crime and Terrorism. Tselyakov told OCCRP reporters that his group was able to identify a number of organized crime gangs that controlled dozens of small Russian banks. These banks, according to Tselyakov, didn’t conduct any real banking activities, but instead received huge amounts of illegal money in their accounts and then wired the money offshore or turned it into cash.
According to Tselyakov, Evgeny Dvoskin was one of the main characters in their investigation.
“Dvoskin, together with his ex-partner Ivan Myazin, controlled a number of Russian banks through (front men). Later, the Central Bank of Russia revoked the licenses of these banks for laundering criminal proceeds. During just several years these banks laundered and sent to offshore companies dozens of billions of dollars,” Tselyakov said.
Dvoskin’s checkered past is documented in a criminal case file which was put together by Tselyakov’s group with the help of the American FBI.
According to the file, Dvoskin was born 1966 in Odessa and, in 1977, moved to the United States with his parents. At the time he used the surname, Slusker. But in 2001, he was deported from the US after a long history of criminal charges for using forged documentation and, after coming back to Ukraine, took his mother’s surname Dvoskin.
According to the FBI files obtained by OCCRP reporters, while in the US Dvoskin was involved in a number of criminal activities. He was arrested for the first time in December 1989 for robbery and for possession of illegal drugs. The following year, Dvoskin was again arrested for theft.
Over the next 10 years Dvoskin was arrested and sentenced to jail numerous times. At various times he was accused of charges typical of a member of an organized crime gang including illegal possession of a firearm, robbery, bribery of public officials, possession of stolen property and stock fraud.
In a letter to the Russian Ministry of Interior, the FBI claimed that Dvoskin shared a cell in a US prison with Vyacheslav Ivankov, also known as “Yaponchik”, a Russian vor v zakon or “thief-in-law” who was one of the best-known leaders in the ranks of the Russian organized crime.  Ivankov was shot by a sniper in 2009 in Moscow and died several months later in the hospital.
The FBI warned Russian police that Dvoskin was likely a close associate of Ivankov.
After coming back to Russia and changing his surname, Dvoskin entered the banking business. In an interrogation with the Russian police, Dvoskin explained his role in the banking sector as “providing safety and stability of financial flows for my clients. These flows go to different banks that I recommend as a financial advisor. I have a broker’s license, got an … education in America, and have great experience in this sphere. I am well known in the banking system. Thus my clients are different banks and companies. The list is very long.”
According to documents from the case file, Dvoskin and his ex-partner Myazin cooperated with scores of Russian banks. Many of those banks were later charged by Russian authorities with money-laundering.
For example, Dvoskin and Myazin worked with Migros bank, Siberian Bank of Development and Falcon bank. All three banks lost their licenses in 2006 and 2007 for violation of anti-money laundering regulations. The amount of money laundered just in these banks totaled about US$ 3 billion.
Tselyakov claims that once his team started to investigate Dvoskin’s banks, they faced unprecedented pressure. “We wiretapped Dvoskin and his partners and found that his group had influential friends in the Russian secret services. They tried to fire me many times. One day the file cabinet of our investigator who led the case against Dvoskin was searched by officers of the Ministry of Interior and Russian security service (FSB). They seized all the important documents from the criminal case,” claimed Tselyakov.
In 2008, Tselyakov, together with his partner, were arrested by law enforcement for attempting to defraud another banker of €1 million euros from another banker. That banker was another controversial Russian businessman, German Gorbuntsov, known in the media as “the black banker”.  Dvoskin and Gorbuntsov knew each other Gorbuntsov would later testify. Tselyakov said the charges were false and designed to get rid of him.
Gorbuntsov and his partners have faced multiple charges of money laundering and fraud and a business partner of Gorbuntsov’s was arrested for murdering the country’s top banking regulator.  Gorbuntsov is currently charged with money laundering in the Republic of Moldova and is wanted by Russian oligarchs who allege he stole hundreds of millions of dollars from them.
Tselyakov was found guilty of fraud and spent more than four years in jail. The criminal case against Dvoskin was stopped and the banker got legal protection from the FSB as a witness.
Meanwhile, the Russian business daily Kommersant is reporting that Dvoskin’s bank in Crimea will merge with the state owned Crimean bank, ChBRR, although the report could not be confirmed and no details are available.
 Users of the “Laundromat”
Genbank was not the only bank to open. Some have connections to a very large money laundering scandal.
 In 2014, OCCRP identified what is believed to be the biggest money-laundering operation in Eastern Europe, called the “Russian Laundromat”. Between 2011 and 2014, organized criminals and corrupt politicians moved US$ 20 billion in dirty funds from Russia to Moldova and then to the European Union.
The complex scheme included dozens of Russian banks including some controlled by Russian President Vladimir Putin’s cousin, Igor Putin.  The money transfers were supported by fake contracts between phantom offshore companies run by proxies who hid the real owners.
The bogus transfers were then legitimized in court decisions by Moldovan judges, many of whom are now under investigation for bribery.  Moldovan authorities have launched a criminal investigation into the “Laundromat” scheme but so far Russian law enforcement has not cooperated with Moldovan authorities.
Meanwhile, some of the Russian bankers involved in the “Laundromat” operations are now doing business in Crimea. According to documents seen by OCCRP reporters, Baltica, a bank from St. Petersburg, was one of the most active users of the “Laundromat.” Moldovan authorities claimed that bogus companies with accounts in Baltica moved more than US$ 2 billion to Moldova from 2011 till 2014.
The director of Baltica, Oksana Chernyak, denied any wrongdoing in a letter to OCCRP.
Businessman Oleg Vlasov is Baltica’s largest shareholder, owning 20 percent of the bank.  Vlasov was also mentioned in a number of documents generated by Tselyakov’s anti-money laundering group. “According  to wiretaps, Vlasov was connected to the biggest money launderers in Russia. We even interrogated him, but didn’t manage to bring any charges against him. The whole investigation was stopped and I was arrested,” says Tselyakov.
Vlasov, together with some partners from Baltica, controls the Verhnevolzhskiy bank. Verhnevolzhskiy was established in 1990  but before coming to Crimea it mainly operated in the Yaroslavskiy region of Russia, where it had a number of subsidiaries in small regional towns.
Verhnevolzhskiy entered Crimea in 2014 and now operates 26 offices. In December 2014, the Central Bank ofRussia fined Verhnevolzhskiy for violating anti-money laundering regulations.  The Central Bank didn’t disclose any details of the violation.
Another Russian bank which was involved in the "Laundromat" is Tempbank. Today it also operates two offices in Crimea. Tempbank was established in 1989  and in 2014 was included in a US sanctions list made in response to events in Syria and not Crimea.
According to a U.S. Department of the Treasury press release, the American government took these actions to put pressure on the Syrian regime and its supporters. “The Treasury Department designated Moscow-based Tempbank and Mikhail Gagloev, a senior executive of the bank, for providing material support and services to the Government of Syria, including the Central Bank of Syria and SYTROL, Syria’s state oil marketing firm”, said the U.S. Department of Treasury in its statement.
 More Money Laundering Connections
K2 is a small bank from the Northern Caucasus republic of Karachay-Cherkessia and is ranked the 471th largest bank in Russia based on assets under its management.  The bank was established in 1994 in Vladikavkaz, Northern Ossetia.
Since then, the bank has changed its name and headquarters a few times. After the annexation of Crimea, K2 opened six offices in Sevastopol, Simferopol, Feodosia and Evpatoria. The bank doesn't operate any of the basic tools used by commercial banks nowadays such as ATMs or pay terminals -- kiosks operated by banks to allow customers to pay their bills easily.
The share capital of the bank is divided between 14 people, with each of them controlling a stake of up to 10 percent. These shareholders are not well known in banking circles in Russia, but OCCRP found that some of them were connected with other financial organizations shut down by authorities for money laundering.
One of the main shareholders of K2 with 10 percent is Margarita Chukanova. According to the Russian commercial register, in 2006 Chukanova was a minority shareholder in the nonbanking credit organization, RK-Center. The operating license of RK-Center was revoked by the Central Bank of Russia in 2006 for money-laundering violations. The Central Bank claimed that clients of the RK-Center made fake payments in excess of 25 billion rubles or about US$ 1 billion at the time to foreign companies.
Another small Moscow-based bank which has opened in Crimea is Adelantbank. The bank was established in 1992 as Lesopromishlenniy bank and in 2012 changed its name to the current one.  Adelantbank ranks 561th among Russian banks based on assets under its management. . Adelantbank operates three offices in Crimea, one in Evpatoria and two in Simferopol. The bank has no ATMs or pay terminals and one of its branches in Simferopol is located in the office previously occupied by the Kyiv-based Finance and Credit bank.
The share capital of the bank is divided between 11 persons, all of them controlling small stakes.
One of owners of Adelantbank is Maxim Lipskiy. According to the Russian Central Bank, in 2014, Lipskiy through a UK company, Brys Worldwide Ltd, held a significant stake (9.8 per cent) in another Moscow bank,Sovinkom. In 2014, the Central Bank revoked the license of Sovinkom for violation of various banking laws including anti-money-laundering. The regulator claimed that in 2013 clients of Sovinkom made dubious financial transactions worth more than 6.8 billion rubles (about US$ 207 million).

Another owner is Anna Lyga who, in 2013, through a set of Russian companies, was an owner of  6,6 % of Genbank, the bank with the second largest network in Crimea.






Here is a sample chapter from my new books “No Time to Say Goodbye: Memoirs of a Life in Foster Care.” Now on Amazon.Com



http://amemoirofalifeinfostercare.blogspot.com/
 Mywritersite.blogspot.com


I used to be Irish Catholic.

I used to be Irish Catholic. Now I’m an American—you grow.    George Carlin


  The single greatest influence in our lives was the church. The Catholic Church in the 1960s differs from what it is today, especially in the Naugatuck Valley, in those days an overwhelmingly conservative Catholic place.
  I was part of what might have been the last generation of American Catholic children who completely and unquestioningly accepted the supernatural as real. Miracles happened. Virgin birth and transubstantiation made perfect sense. Mere humans did in fact, become saints. There was a Holy Ghost. Guardian angels walked beside us and our patron saints really did put in a good word for us every now and then.
   Church was at the center of our lives.  Being a Roman Catholic back then was no small chore. In fact, it was a lot of work. The Mass was in Latin, conducted with the priest’s back to the flock. (We were a flock. Protestant were the more democratically named “congregation.”)
  Aside from Sunday Mass there were also eleven Holy Days of Obligation that we had to attend, and then there were the all-important sacraments of First Confession, First Communion, and Confirmation, all ornate and dramatic affairs that happened within a few years of each other.
  We dressed properly in a suit coat and tie for Sunday mass. Fridays were meatless as a means of penance. At school, there was prayer in the morning before classes began, prayer before lunch, prayer after lunch and prayer before we went home. There was also a half-hour of religion class every day. And there was fasting. In those days, Catholics fasted eight hours before receiving communion.
   Then there was confession on Saturday, mandatory because Sunday Mass was also mandatory and so was taking Holy Communion, which could not be accepted without first going to confession.  We had to go to confession twice in a week: once on Fridays, since the nuns were convinced none of us would go on our own over the weekend, and then once again on Saturday afternoons when Helen made us go.
  When I made my first confession at age seven, we were taught that there were two types of sin: mortal sins, which were serious sins, and venial sins, which were lesser sins,  lying and disobedience. The nuns said that we would have to narrow our selection to venial sins since we were far too young to have any mortal sins against our soul. 
  One of little girls in the group raised her hand and asked, “What’s adultery?”
 “Nothing to worry yourself over, dear,” the nun answered, “It’s for adults, and it is a most grievous offense against God.” I liked the sound of that, “most grievous offense against God.” Sounded serious.
  Confession was a big deal and involved a lot of formality—kneeling in darkness, foreign languages, and solemnity—and I didn’t waste all that somberness with unworthy sins, so when the priest slid open the little wooden door that separated us in the dark I began my prayer.
 “Deus meus, ex toto corde paenitet me omnium meorum peccatorum—” In full, the words meant “O my God, I am heartily sorry for having offended Thee, and I detest all my sins because I fear the loss of heaven and the pains of hell, but most of all because they offend Thee, my God, Who art all good and deserving of all my love. I firmly resolve with the help of Thy grace to confess my sins, to do penance, and to amend my life. Amen.”
  Then the sins were confessed. I told the priest I had committed adultery.
  “Adultery, huh?” the priest said.
  “Yes, Father,” I answered as solemnly as I could. “Adultery.”
 “So, how’d that work out for you?” he asked.
 “Ah,” I answered, “you know.”
  “No,” he said, “actually I don’t. So how many times did you do this, this adultery?”
  “Like, I think, three times, Father.”
 “I see,” he said. “And during those times, were you alone or with others?”
  “No, Father,  I was alone.”
  “And do you think you’ll be committing this sin again in the near future?”
 “Naw, Father,” I answered. “I’m pretty much over it.”
   As the years went and I became more confessional-savvy, I learned that the dumber the sin, the lighter the penance, the prayer for forgiveness that one was required to say up at the altar after the confession had ended.
  So in the name of efficiency, I developed a pre-packaged list of dumb sins, like “I disobeyed my mother,” or “I fought with my brother,” or “I failed to say my nightly prayer.”
  Through trial and error, I learned that every now and then I would have to toss a more serious sin into the mix or the priests might get testy and tax me with a big penance. So I tossed in the fail-safe sex sin, “I had evil thoughts about _____” and would fill in the name of the girl who struck me at the moment. I rotated the sins and the priests, and, overall, the system worked.
  One Saturday, Denny and his gang of desperadoes showed up for confession and slid into the pew with me and waited for our turn at the confessional.
  Denny turned to me and said, “Johnny, you got any good sins?”
   Feeling magnanimous, I shared my formula for a hassle-free confession, and in closing said, “And then you say ‘I had evil thoughts about Mary Puravich,’ or whatever,’” using the name of a pretty girl from my class.
  Denny shared my sin system with his friends, who were always in a hurry to cut their way to the front of the line, have their confessions heard, and leave without saying their penance. I went in to the confessional and said my piece, ending with, “and I had evil thoughts about Mary Puravich.”
  “You know,” said the priest, “I gotta meet this Mary Puravich. She must be some kind of knockout, because the last four guys in here said the same thing about her.”  
  For all purposes, school was an extension of church, and unlike the way we lived in Waterbury, school was no longer optional. We were to be at Our Lady of the Assumption Catholic School, in uniform, Monday through Friday from eight a.m. until three p.m. No excuses.
  Because I lacked almost any formal education at that point, I couldn’t read or write, so it was decided that I should start school from the beginning—first grade—making me roughly two years older than my classmates.
  Assumption was already over fifty years old. Walter and his sisters had been schooled there in the 1930s and the building , basically unchanged, had nothing sleek or new. It had sixteen classrooms for two hundred and fifty students, no gymnasium or cafeteria, highly polished wooden floors, and enormously large windows that each had to be opened and closed with a long pole with a hook on the end of it.
  Our teachers were members of the Sisters of Mercy, an order formed in Ireland in 1831 to aid the poor, arriving in America in 1843 to minister to the famished Irish flocking to the states. Several of the nuns who had taught Walter were still living at the convent and filling in as substitute teachers, and one or two of them were still teaching full-time.
  Classes began with the ringing of an enormous brass handbell by a nun who was strong enough to pick it up and move it around. Boys and girls played apart from each other on different sides of the school yard. The boys were clad in white shirts and green ties with the letter A sewn into the middle of them, black slacks, black socks, and black lace-up shoes. Loafers and pointed-toe shoes, then all the rage because of the Beatles, were forbidden. The girls were required to wear black Mary Janes, white or green knee socks, and a green dress uniform with an under slip, and a white, button-down shirt. They were also issued green beanies to wear in church, although I can’t recall that any of the girls ever wore one.
  Just beneath the schoolyard was Farrell’s Foundry. At different times of the day, the mill released its afterburn from the enormous smokestacks that dotted the skyline. Tens of thousands of black specks shot into the air, making it look like a black-snow blizzard had hit our little town. The specks rained down on our white shirts, ruining them forever with ink-black spots of burned iron.
 Every school day started with a prayer, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance and then religion class. Sometimes one of the priests stopped by during religion class and opened the floor to discussions, wrongly assuming the questions would be deep and theological. What he got was, “Father, all right, look, if the Russians fired an atomic bomb at us and Jesus flies out of heaven and swallows it and it explodes in his stomach—will he be dead?”
  The best one came from Peggy Sullivan, who asked, “If Jesus shaves off his beard, will he lose all his magical powers?” and then, pausing to catch her breath, “and if so, how screwed are we?”
  One kid in the class, Patsy Sheehan, resented having to learn certain things about our religion the difference between venial sins and mortal sins, the Act of Contrition and so on. When the priest told us we that we had to choose a middle name for our confirmation, Patsy complained, “I got enough on my plate already.”
  The priest insisted she pick a new middle name. Patsy asked, “What’s Jesus’s middle name?”
 “He’s Jesus. He doesn’t have one,” the priest answered.
  “So, what’s he, special?” Patsy asked. 
   Then there was Martin O’Toole, a wonderful, magnificent liar. He lied in such awesome, Herculean fashion that his tales were artful, Homeric. Our nun once asked, “Mr. O’Toole, why have you not turned in your homework?”
  Martin waited until he had everyone’s attention and then stood slowly and dramatically from his desk, put his hands on his tiny waist and said, “Sister, last night I was in my back yard playing when I picked up a rock from the ground.” He then recounted the scene of him picking up what must have been a boulder the size of Rhode Island, “and as soon as I picked it up, oil! Bubbling crude came bursting out of the ground, millions of gallons of it! I was soaked in oil.” He paused and looked around the room and added, in hushed tones, “It took me hours to put that rock back on that oil and save this entire city.”
  He returned to his seat and said, “And that’s why I didn’t time to do my homework, Sister.”
  The nun’s jaw had dropped, and the silence of the moment was broken only when Micky Sullivan, a dense and gullible child, asked, “What kind of oil was it, Martin?”
  “Esso,” he replied. “It was Esso oil.”
  Many years later, Johnny became mayor of a small town in the Valley. An investigation of the town’s finances showed fifty thousand dollars missing from the treasury and all the evidence pointed to Martin. When asked to produce the town’s books, Martin said, that “The books are gone. Mice ate them.” He served two years in federal prison.
  Then there was Ilene Flynn, a little red-haired, freckled-faced, fair-skinned girl who was more pious than the Pope. I knew a lot about her because the nuns thought we looked alike and paired me with her for all religious functions.
  At our First Holy Communion, Ilene was so nervous her mouth went dry. Unable to swallow the host and forbidden to touch it—only a priest could do that—she ran around in circles crying hysterically, “Jesus is stuck in my mouth! Jesus is stuck in my mouth!” while the nuns flocked around her shouting instructions about swallowing, “Go like this, Ilene, go like this!” and then they did a swallowing demonstration that made them look a lot like penguins eating long fish.
  Ilene’s Friday afternoon confessions were epic. She confessed to everything, I mean absolutely everything, and she actually said all of her penance, unlike the rest of us who negotiated a lighter-sentence deal with God before we got to the rail. My policy on penance was one for five. If I were given thirty Hail Marys as penance, in the deal God and I worked out, I said six.
  Once, Ilene came out of the confessional in tears, wailing loud enough to wake the dead.
  “What is it, Ilene?” Sister asked. “What happened?”
  “Father O’Leary told me I’m going to hell on a lying rap,” she wailed, “and I don’t know what a rap is!”




Controversial Russian Bankers Target Crimea


Written by Evgeny Zhuravlev

Some of the first banks that streamed into Crimea after Russia wrested control of the region from Ukraine in 2014 were better known for laundering money than banking.
Five of the banks have questionable histories, including ties to the US$ 20 billion money laundering scandal known as the Russian Laundromat revealed last year by OCCRP.  Although most of these banks were small and barely known in Russia, they have grown significantly since arriving in Crimea.
Their presence raises questions about Russia’s commitment to eliminate money laundering, amid concerns that Crimea could become another major international money laundering and organized crime zone like Transnistria, Ossetia and other disputed territories on the Russian border.

The Financial Meltdown
It’s been over a year since Crimean voters chose to leave Ukraine and join Russia in a disputed referendum. That quick decision led to a wholesale meltdown of the region’s banking industry.
Ukrainian banks operating in Crimea rushed to close almost 1000 branches in Crimea, following a ban imposed by the National Bank of Ukraine on financial operations in the contested territory. As they left, they may have taken with them the assets and deposits of some local account holders although how much is not clear. They also left with loans they gave out often unpaid.
At the time, Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk-based Privatbank was the largest network with 337 branches followed by the Ukrainian state-owned Oshchadbank, with more than 250 branches. Ukraine’s banking regulator refused to cooperate with the Russian occupation authority as relations deteriorated.
Trade with neighboring Ukraine screeched to a halt.  Then waves of international sanctions hit the region. Mastercard and Visa suspended operations making life even harder for consumers as suddenly their credit cards became useless plastic.
The Black Sea Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the Morskoy Bank, two local Crimean banks, stayed behind but they couldn’t handle the overwhelming customer demand. People were forced to stand in queues for days to pay fees, taxes and duties of vital importance to their businesses; some fainted from the strain.
The new rulers of the Crimean Federal District attempted to establish a new financial system even as they were hit with a sharp drop in the ruble and a severe shortage of ruble reserves. They quickly passed a law to create a new financial infrastructure and a brand-new financial institution, the Fund for Depositor Protection (FDP).
The FDP’s role was to handle compensation payouts to Ukrainian banks’ depositors and to administer the 'nationalized' property of the Ukrainian banks.
Closely following Kremlin troops into this chaos came a few small Russian banks with controversial pasts and good connections.  They were the first to benefit from the nationalization of property. They would be followed by more respected banks later – there are now 28 different Russian banks on the peninsula – but the first benefited the most.

From a US prison cell to Crimean shores
On April 4, 2014, Genbank became the first Russian bank to open its doors in Sevastopol  just two weeks after the peninsula became part of the Russian Federation. At the time, Genbank was unknown to most Russians, having branches only in Omsk and Rostov-on-Don.
The small bank was ranked 315th place among Russian banks in terms of total assets managed.  But, since the annexation of Crimea, Genbank has shown tremendous growth. According to its website , the bank operates more than 90 offices in Crimea and is the second largest banking network on the peninsula.
The FDP leased to Genbank real estate and other property previously owned by Ukrainian banks,  including ATMs, terminals and infrastructure. Genbank moved into the offices of Ukrainian banks that had pulled out including JCB Pivdennyi, JSC Kredobank and JSB Brokbusinessbank.
Genbank offers its clients Russian Unistream and CONTACT wire transfer services and issues credit cards, with the restriction that they cannot be used for internet payments. The bank is connected to the international payment system via Rosbank, a Moscow-based subsidiary of Societe Generale.
Genbank is partially owned by the controversial Russian banker, Evgeny Dvoskin, who controls 4.8 per cent of the share capital; his wife heads the bank’s board. Dvoskin has been investigated several times by various branches of Russian law enforcement for alleged involvement in money laundering, but has yet to face charges.
Instead, those who have investigated Dvoskin have found themselves in trouble and even sentenced to jail.

 Tackling Money Laundering
In 2006 a group of operatives from the Russian Ministry of Interior started an investigation into a group of Russian banks involved in large-scale money laundering operations. Their effort, they say, was among the largest financial investigation ever started in Russia. Officers of the group, most of them retired today, told OCCRP that the turnover of the money-laundering operations they tracked during the three-year investigation exceeded 1 trillion rubles.
The enforcement effort was led by Dmitry Tselyakov, then a major in the Department to Combat Organized Crime and Terrorism. Tselyakov told OCCRP reporters that his group was able to identify a number of organized crime gangs that controlled dozens of small Russian banks. These banks, according to Tselyakov, didn’t conduct any real banking activities, but instead received huge amounts of illegal money in their accounts and then wired the money offshore or turned it into cash.
According to Tselyakov, Evgeny Dvoskin was one of the main characters in their investigation.
“Dvoskin, together with his ex-partner Ivan Myazin, controlled a number of Russian banks through (front men). Later, the Central Bank of Russia revoked the licenses of these banks for laundering criminal proceeds. During just several years these banks laundered and sent to offshore companies dozens of billions of dollars,” Tselyakov said.
Dvoskin’s checkered past is documented in a criminal case file which was put together by Tselyakov’s group with the help of the American FBI.
According to the file, Dvoskin was born 1966 in Odessa and, in 1977, moved to the United States with his parents. At the time he used the surname, Slusker. But in 2001, he was deported from the US after a long history of criminal charges for using forged documentation and, after coming back to Ukraine, took his mother’s surname Dvoskin.
According to the FBI files obtained by OCCRP reporters, while in the US Dvoskin was involved in a number of criminal activities. He was arrested for the first time in December 1989 for robbery and for possession of illegal drugs. The following year, Dvoskin was again arrested for theft.
Over the next 10 years Dvoskin was arrested and sentenced to jail numerous times. At various times he was accused of charges typical of a member of an organized crime gang including illegal possession of a firearm, robbery, bribery of public officials, possession of stolen property and stock fraud.
In a letter to the Russian Ministry of Interior, the FBI claimed that Dvoskin shared a cell in a US prison with Vyacheslav Ivankov, also known as “Yaponchik”, a Russian vor v zakon or “thief-in-law” who was one of the best-known leaders in the ranks of the Russian organized crime.  Ivankov was shot by a sniper in 2009 in Moscow and died several months later in the hospital.
The FBI warned Russian police that Dvoskin was likely a close associate of Ivankov.
After coming back to Russia and changing his surname, Dvoskin entered the banking business. In an interrogation with the Russian police, Dvoskin explained his role in the banking sector as “providing safety and stability of financial flows for my clients. These flows go to different banks that I recommend as a financial advisor. I have a broker’s license, got an … education in America, and have great experience in this sphere. I am well known in the banking system. Thus my clients are different banks and companies. The list is very long.”
According to documents from the case file, Dvoskin and his ex-partner Myazin cooperated with scores of Russian banks. Many of those banks were later charged by Russian authorities with money-laundering.
For example, Dvoskin and Myazin worked with Migros bank, Siberian Bank of Development and Falcon bank. All three banks lost their licenses in 2006 and 2007 for violation of anti-money laundering regulations. The amount of money laundered just in these banks totaled about US$ 3 billion.
Tselyakov claims that once his team started to investigate Dvoskin’s banks, they faced unprecedented pressure. “We wiretapped Dvoskin and his partners and found that his group had influential friends in the Russian secret services. They tried to fire me many times. One day the file cabinet of our investigator who led the case against Dvoskin was searched by officers of the Ministry of Interior and Russian security service (FSB). They seized all the important documents from the criminal case,” claimed Tselyakov.
In 2008, Tselyakov, together with his partner, were arrested by law enforcement for attempting to defraud another banker of €1 million euros from another banker. That banker was another controversial Russian businessman, German Gorbuntsov, known in the media as “the black banker”.  Dvoskin and Gorbuntsov knew each other Gorbuntsov would later testify. Tselyakov said the charges were false and designed to get rid of him.
Gorbuntsov and his partners have faced multiple charges of money laundering and fraud and a business partner of Gorbuntsov’s was arrested for murdering the country’s top banking regulator.  Gorbuntsov is currently charged with money laundering in the Republic of Moldova and is wanted by Russian oligarchs who allege he stole hundreds of millions of dollars from them.
Tselyakov was found guilty of fraud and spent more than four years in jail. The criminal case against Dvoskin was stopped and the banker got legal protection from the FSB as a witness.
Meanwhile, the Russian business daily Kommersant is reporting that Dvoskin’s bank in Crimea will merge with the state owned Crimean bank, ChBRR, although the report could not be confirmed and no details are available.
 Users of the “Laundromat”
Genbank was not the only bank to open. Some have connections to a very large money laundering scandal.
In 2014, OCCRP identified what is believed to be the biggest money-laundering operation in Eastern Europe, called the “Russian Laundromat”. Between 2011 and 2014, organized criminals and corrupt politicians moved US$ 20 billion in dirty funds from Russia to Moldova and then to the European Union.
The complex scheme included dozens of Russian banks including some controlled by Russian President Vladimir Putin’s cousin, Igor Putin.  The money transfers were supported by fake contracts between phantom offshore companies run by proxies who hid the real owners.
The bogus transfers were then legitimized in court decisions by Moldovan judges, many of whom are now under investigation for bribery.  Moldovan authorities have launched a criminal investigation into the “Laundromat” scheme but so far Russian law enforcement has not cooperated with Moldovan authorities.
Meanwhile, some of the Russian bankers involved in the “Laundromat” operations are now doing business in Crimea. According to documents seen by OCCRP reporters, Baltica, a bank from St. Petersburg, was one of the most active users of the “Laundromat.” Moldovan authorities claimed that bogus companies with accounts in Baltica moved more than US$ 2 billion to Moldova from 2011 till 2014.
The director of Baltica, Oksana Chernyak, denied any wrongdoing in a letter to OCCRP.
Businessman Oleg Vlasov is Baltica’s largest shareholder, owning 20 percent of the bank.  Vlasov was also mentioned in a number of documents generated by Tselyakov’s anti-money laundering group. “According  to wiretaps, Vlasov was connected to the biggest money launderers in Russia. We even interrogated him, but didn’t manage to bring any charges against him. The whole investigation was stopped and I was arrested,” says Tselyakov.
Vlasov, together with some partners from Baltica, controls the Verhnevolzhskiy bank. Verhnevolzhskiy was established in 1990  but before coming to Crimea it mainly operated in the Yaroslavskiy region of Russia, where it had a number of subsidiaries in small regional towns.
Verhnevolzhskiy entered Crimea in 2014 and now operates 26 offices. In December 2014, the Central Bank of Russia fined Verhnevolzhskiy for violating anti-money laundering regulations.  The Central Bank didn’t disclose any details of the violation.
Another Russian bank which was involved in the "Laundromat" is Tempbank. Today it also operates two offices in Crimea. Tempbank was established in 1989  and in 2014 was included in a US sanctions list made in response to events in Syria and not Crimea.
According to a U.S. Department of the Treasury press release, the American government took these actions to put pressure on the Syrian regime and its supporters. “The Treasury Department designated Moscow-based Tempbank and Mikhail Gagloev, a senior executive of the bank, for providing material support and services to the Government of Syria, including the Central Bank of Syria and SYTROL, Syria’s state oil marketing firm”, said the U.S. Department of Treasury in its statement.

More Money Laundering Connections
K2 is a small bank from the Northern Caucasus republic of Karachay-Cherkessia and is ranked the 471th largest bank in Russia based on assets under its management.  The bank was established in 1994 in Vladikavkaz, Northern Ossetia.
Since then, the bank has changed its name and headquarters a few times. After the annexation of Crimea, K2 opened six offices in Sevastopol, Simferopol, Feodosia and Evpatoria. The bank doesn't operate any of the basic tools used by commercial banks nowadays such as ATMs or pay terminals -- kiosks operated by banks to allow customers to pay their bills easily.
The share capital of the bank is divided between 14 people, with each of them controlling a stake of up to 10 percent. These shareholders are not well known in banking circles in Russia, but OCCRP found that some of them were connected with other financial organizations shut down by authorities for money laundering.
One of the main shareholders of K2 with 10 percent is Margarita Chukanova. According to the Russian commercial register, in 2006 Chukanova was a minority shareholder in the nonbanking credit organization, RK-Center. The operating license of RK-Center was revoked by the Central Bank of Russia in 2006 for money-laundering violations. The Central Bank claimed that clients of the RK-Center made fake payments in excess of 25 billion rubles or about US$ 1 billion at the time to foreign companies.
Another small Moscow-based bank which has opened in Crimea is Adelantbank. The bank was established in 1992 as Lesopromishlenniy bank and in 2012 changed its name to the current one.  Adelantbank ranks 561th among Russian banks based on assets under its management. . Adelantbank operates three offices in Crimea, one in Evpatoria and two in Simferopol. The bank has no ATMs or pay terminals and one of its branches in Simferopol is located in the office previously occupied by the Kyiv-based Finance and Credit bank.
The share capital of the bank is divided between 11 persons, all of them controlling small stakes.
One of owners of Adelantbank is Maxim Lipskiy. According to the Russian Central Bank, in 2014, Lipskiy through a UK company, Brys Worldwide Ltd, held a significant stake (9.8 per cent) in another Moscow bank, Sovinkom. In 2014, the Central Bank revoked the license of Sovinkom for violation of various banking laws including anti-money-laundering. The regulator claimed that in 2013 clients of Sovinkom made dubious financial transactions worth more than 6.8 billion rubles (about US$ 207 million).
Another owner is Anna Lyga who, in 2013, through a set of Russian companies, was an owner of  6,6 % of Genbank, the bank with the second largest network in Crimea